In Praise of Scott Wiener
I had the pleasure of meeting Scott Wiener a few times when I lived in San Francisco. He was then on the Board of Supervisors, representing District 8, the other side of the city from my apartment in the Presidio. We were on a panel together in 2015 hosted by Tumml, the urban tech incubator, talking about ways to make city life better, greener and more affordable for all. Wiener's ideas were fresh, smart and grounded in his own and his constituents’ experiences. No BS, no small talk.
So it’s no wonder that, having been elected to the state senate in 2016, Wiener is making his mark quickly on the matter of affordable housing, not only in his hometown of San Francisco, but across the Golden State, where affordable housing has risen to the top of the state’s policy agenda.
And for good reason: Between 2009 and 2014, the state added 544,000 households but only 467,000 net new housing units, according to the McKinsey Global Institute. It now ranks 49th in housing units per capita. Seven of the 10 most expensive real estate markets in the US are in California. McKinsey estimates that the housing crisis is costing California $140 billion a year in lost economic output. And the list of horribles goes on.
Which is why Wiener has led the charge on two major bills: SB35, which streamlines the approval process for affordable housing projects in communities that lag behind state housing targets, and a new law, SB 827, known as the Transit Zoning Bill, which would require that all areas within a half-mile of a major transit stop, or within a quarter-mile of a bus or transit corridor, allow minimum building heights of 45 or 85 feet (depending on distance from transit, street width and other criteria), superceding local zoning rules. The bill would also waive any minimum parking requirements and prohibit any design standards that would have the effect of lowering the square footage allowed on a lot.
SB 35 is now state law. SB 827 is pending. Their purpose is the same: to use the power of state action to override local inaction. As with other key social policy issues such as civil rights and environmental protection, many, but not all, local communities have proved that they can’t be trusted to do the right thing thanks largely to restrictive zoning laws and the entrenched power of Not In My Back Yard activists concerned about their property values or views or traffic or simply change itself. In some cases, it's more insidious, like racism or classism.
Senator Wiener put it more eloquently and strategically: “We are moving past the era where every city in California could view itself as an independent kingdom that could refuse to build any housing. Our cities are all interconnected, and housing decisions in one city affect many other cities, and state law needs to reflect that.”
I think Senator Wiener is pushing California to do what it does best, to lead and innovate for the greater good, to rewrite the rules in the name of progress and change.
I also think, in due course, other states will follow. Or fall further behind.
